Parle ProductsBiscuits
Could not read
Don't rely on this scan. Try another photo.
Part of this label could not be read. Nothing may be assumed about the part that was not: it is not a reading of zero, and it is not an all clear.
We couldn't read the allergy line on this pack.
That is not the same as saying it has none. If you are avoiding something, read the printed pack.
The front-of-pack claim could not be read, so this rule could not be applied.
maida is in the ingredients and the allergen declaration could not be read. We cannot say whether it is declared.
milk is in the ingredients and the allergen declaration could not be read. We cannot say whether it is declared.
wheat is in the ingredients and the allergen declaration could not be read. We cannot say whether it is declared.
needs review Worked out from figures read once from this label and not yet checked against a second reading.
Not on the label, so counted as zero: Fibre, Fruit, vegetables and legumes. The real grade may be better, not worse.
Nutri-Score is a European scheme applied to the figures on this Indian label. The maker did not print it, and India does not use it.
Things to limit 21 − good points 0 = 21, which is E.
Rule version: nutriscore-2023. Nutri-Score, Santé publique France
The flags above are the same for everyone. Sign in to have this pack checked against your own avoid list as well. The label facts on this page never need an account.
Sign inAdd yourself, your kids, or your parents. When signed in, Laddoo checks this product against each person’s allergy, health condition and avoid list.
We do not call this level high or low. That word needs a published threshold with its source, and we have none for this nutrient yet - so the share of a day is what we show.
Daily amount from WHO Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children (2015), recommendation 2
We do not call this level high or low. That word needs a published threshold with its source, and we have none for this nutrient yet - so the share of a day is what we show.
Daily amount from WHO Guideline: Sodium intake for adults and children (2012), recommendation 1
Sugar per 100 g
Needs attentionAdded sugar 26.3 g per 100 g. Above the 22.5 g per 100 g mark we tint this row with. That mark is the UK Food Standards Agency’s, not an Indian rule, and it decides nothing.
Sodium per 100 g
Worth knowing310 mg sodium per 100 g - moderate.
Saturated fat
Worth knowing6.2 g per 100 g - moderate.
Trans fat
Nothing to flag0.1 g per 100 g - negligible.
Every figure below is per 100 g of the product, as printed on the pack.
| Nutrient | Amount per 100 g |
|---|---|
| Energy | 456 kcal |
| Protein | could not be read |
| Carbohydrate | could not be read |
| Total sugarsAdded sugar 26.3 g per 100 g. Above the 22.5 g per 100 g mark we tint this row with. That mark is the UK Food Standards Agency’s, not an Indian rule, and it decides nothing. | 26.3 g |
| Added sugarsAdded sugar 26.3 g per 100 g. Above the 22.5 g per 100 g mark we tint this row with. That mark is the UK Food Standards Agency’s, not an Indian rule, and it decides nothing. | 26.3 g |
| Total fat | 13.1 g |
| Saturated fat6.2 g per 100 g - moderate. | 6.2 g |
| Trans fat | 0.1 g |
| Sodium310 mg sodium per 100 g - moderate. | 310 mg |
Not read from this panel: Protein, Carbohydrate. Missing here means we could not read it, not that the figure is zero.
9 ingredients
In the order declared on the pack.
All of this comes from the ingredients list alone. It does not account for processing methods, or for anything the pack did not print.
Numbered substances the pack declares, with the name behind each number. We name them; we do not say whether the amount used is allowed.
